Canned Hunting of Endangered Species is Illegal
From the Stuff You Probably Thought Was Too Obvious to Have to Sue About Desk:
A district court in Washington D.C. has struck down a Bush Era U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service rule that allowed canned hunting of endangered species. Canned hunting is the shooting of semi-tame animals on fenced “ranches” (see here for some previous posts). During canned excursions, the animals have nowhere to run — even if they knew they were in danger — and thus can be slaughtered with ease. Such “hunts” require no skill (indeed, many “ranches” offer a guaranteed kill). Reviled by most hunters, they are primarily the province of folks like Dick Cheney and his fellow “sportsmen.”
The Endangered Species Act, Section 9 makes it illegal to “take” any animal on the endangered species list. Yet, among the animals FWS allowed to be canned and killed were the scimitar-horned oryx, addax and dama gazelle, all endangered African species. Thus the lawsuit.
To the chagrin of the Safari Club and their ilk, the court found that charging “sportsmen” big bucks to shoot endangered animals violates the Endangered Species Act. Kudos to the Humane Society, Defenders of Wildlife, Born Free USA, Kimya Institute and several others for forcing the courts to state the obvious and thus stop at least this part of the slaughter. Read the HSUS press release here and the Safari Club’s Orwellian spin on how killing these animals actually protects them here.
–David Cassuto
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (28)
- September 2009 (39)
- August 2009 (25)
- July 2009 (26)
- June 2009 (21)
- May 2009 (23)
- April 2009 (22)
- March 2009 (30)
- February 2009 (12)
- January 2009 (14)
- December 2008 (13)
-
Categories
- AETA
- animal advocacy
- animal cruelty
- animal ethics
- animal experimentation
- animal law
- animal rights
- animal scholarship
- animal welfare
- blogging
- California's Proposition 2
- canned hunting
- castration
- circuses
- climate change
- dehorning
- environmental ethics
- environmental law
- factory farms
- fishing
- hunting
- IUCN
- spay/neuter
- swine flu
- thanksgiving
- Trusts
- Uncategorized
- Wills
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
To see more on this case, FRIENDS OF ANIMALS v. KEN SALAZAR (Civil Action 04-01660), readers might wish to visit http://www.friendsofanimals.org and be sure to subscribe to the Autumn issue of FoA’s ActionLine magazine. We have a relatively small budget (thank goodness for the pro bono work of Denver University’s Environmental Law Clinic) and support is greatly appreciated. We are also suing on behalf of 14 groups of tropical birds under the ESA, and the deer of Valley Forge National Historical Park under NEPA.
Lee Hall
Legal Director, FoA
Comment by Lee Hall | July 10, 2009