Posted on October 27, 2010 by David
In 2007, the United Nations General Assembly, recognizing that human activity was causing a highly accelerated rate of species extinctions, and expressing concern that such mass extinctions could have far reaching social, economic, environmental and cultural impacts passed G.A. Resolution 61/203. This resolution reaffirmed a target date, 2010, set at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, by which time a significant reduction in rate of loss of biodiversity should have been achieved. 2010, as the target date, was named the International Year of Biodiversity.
Now that it is 2010, it can easily be seen that this goal has not been achieved. Arguably, species, such as the West African Black Rhinoceros pictured above, are disappearing from the Earth at a faster rate than they were when the resolution was passed. The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, in its Global Biodiversity Outlook publication, itself notes that while setting the 2010 goal spurred some 170 countries into creating biodiversity strategies, the goal of reducing the rate of extinctions is far from being met due to economic and political pressures. In fact, the publication acknowledges that continuing species extinctions far above historic rates will continue into the century.
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal law, endangered species, environmental law | Tagged: 10th Convention on Biological Diversity, animal advocacy, animal law, biodiversity, endangered species, environmental advocacy, environmental ethics, environmental law, environmentalism, Global Biodiversity Outlook, International Year of Biodiversity, Naoto Kan, Ryo Matsumoto, U.N. G.A. Resolution 61/203, United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, World Summit on Sustainable Development | 1 Comment »
Posted on October 24, 2010 by David
The New York Daily News reports here that a Long Beach (New York) man twice sexually assaulted a dog:
[The accused] entered the apartment in the house he owned and sexually assaulted the male dog, a 23-pound Shiba Inu named Snowball, prosecutors said.
They said the tenants called authorities after seeing the latest assault Thursday.
The other assault took place Oct. 12. * * * Snowball was examined at a nearby animal hospital and showed signs of trauma, including injuries to his legs consistent with being roughly restrained.
According to another news report (here), the accused man “used to own the dog but gave it to his tenants, who contacted authorities after reportedly walking in on [the accused] sexually abusing the dog in their own apartment.” Did the tenants contact authorities only after the second incident? Why did they turn a blind eye to abuse of any kind? Continue reading
Filed under: animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal law, animal welfare | Tagged: animal abuse, animal cruelty, animal law, animal suffering, animal welfare, human/animal sexual assault, pets, sex with animals, sexual misconduct | 3 Comments »
Posted on October 21, 2010 by David
Long ago, miners used canaries to measure the build up of toxic gases in the mines where they were working. If the canary died, it was time to head out because the air was dangerous. We don’t use canaries in mines anymore. Now we use polar bears in the Arctic. The threat to the bear serves as a monitoring mechanism of sorts for the global threat from carbon emissions in the atmosphere.
As you may recall, the impending demise of polar bears due to habitat destruction attributed to global warming generated some hooha not too long ago. W’s Interior Secretary, Dirk Kempthorne, hemmed and hawed for as long as possible before finally declaring the bear a “threatened” species under the Endangered Species Act. That designation would normally require federal action to address the cause (global warming) of the bear’s habitat. However, the Bushies propounded a rule – later embraced by the Obama Administration, excluding carbon emissions from regulation under the ESA. That made the bear’s victory (such as it was) pyrrhic at best. Nonetheless, in the heady optimism of the time, many (including me) felt that it was perhaps better to wait for a statute explicitly aimed at mitigating national emissions rather than to use the blunt instrument of the ESA to accomplish a very complex regulatory act.
Filed under: animal law, climate change, endangered species, environmental law, marine animals | Tagged: animal ethics, animal law, animal welfare, bush administration, Center for Biological Diversity, climate change, Department of Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, endangered species, Endangered Species Act, environmental advocacy, environmental law, EPA, ESA, Fish & Wildlife Service, FWS, global warming, Obama Administration, polar bears | 3 Comments »
Posted on October 21, 2010 by David
When contemplating American Icons, mustangs inevitably come to mind. In fact, in the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act, Congress stated that wild free-roaming horses are living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West, which contribute to the diversity of life forms within the Nation and enrich the lives of the American people. Unfortunately, the Bureau of Land Management is currently removing, via controlled round-ups, this symbol of the American spirit from their habitats throughout the western United States. Two such round-ups currently in the news are occurring in Colorado and Wyoming (a round-up that aims to remove 2,000 horses from rangelands). After these round-ups, BLM plans to either auction captured horses or to house them in government owned corrals.
According to the Bureau of Land Management’s Director, Bob Abbey, the reason for these round-ups is that the Western rangeland is currently home to 38,400 free-roaming population horses and burros, which exceeds by nearly 12,000 the number of horses and burros that the BLM has determined can exist in balance with other public rangeland resources and uses. Animal welfare organizations, however, disagree with these calculations and policies, and claimed in a unified letter signed by 120 organizations that: Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal law | Tagged: animal abuse, animal advocacy, animal ethics, animal law, animal welfare, ASPCA, BLM, Cloud Foundation, environmental advocacy, environmental ethics, environmental law, Habitat for Horses, mustangs, Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act, wild horses | 1 Comment »
Posted on October 20, 2010 by David
Oh to be young again. NYU is launching an Animal Studies Initiative. NYU students will soon be able to minor in animal studies and the initiative will also create opportunities for interdisciplinary courses, conferences and other research projects. Professor Dale Jamieson, who heads NYU’s Environmental Studies Program and has written much that needs to be read in the animal studies arena, will head the program. He notes:
The interdisciplinary field of Animal Studies has developed rapidly over the past two decades, opening up new areas of research both within and between many existing academic fields. Animal Studies addresses questions about the uniqueness of human beings with respect to other animals, the moral status of animals and their cultural meanings, and the roles they play in our imagination and arts.
Filed under: animal ethics, animal law education, animal scholarship | Tagged: animal advocacy, animal ethics, animal law, animal rights, animal scholarship, animal welfare, Animal Welfare Advocacy, Animal Welfare Trust, Brad Goldberg, Dale Jamieson, David Wolfson, environmental ethics, NYU, NYU Animal Studies Initiative | 3 Comments »
Posted on October 18, 2010 by David
During his campaign, Obama’s campaign spokesman noted that, “as president, Senator Obama will fight to maintain the strong protections of the Endangered Species Act.” Just a few months after taking office, this statement rang true, when the Obama administration reversed the Bush administration’s eleventh-hour regulation which circumvented Endangered Species Act mandates by allowing federal agencies to make their own determination as to whether their projects would harm endangered species, without having to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service. According to Carl Pope, former executive director of the Sierra Club, this move by the Obama administration brought science back into the Endangered Species decision-making process, and numerous environmental groups hailed the move as a major protective step for threatened species. Continue reading
Filed under: animal law | Tagged: animal advocacy, animal law, Carl Pope, Center for Biological Diversity, endangered species, Endangered Species Ac, environmental advocacy, environmental law, environmentalism, ESA, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, Obama Administration, President Obama | 4 Comments »
Posted on October 17, 2010 by Seth
In Long Island, New York last Tuesday, the Suffolk County Legislature unanimously approved a bill, sponsored by legislator Jon Cooper, creating the nation’s first registry for people convicted of animal abuse. The online registry operates in a similar fashion to the online registration required for sex offenders under Megan’s Laws. Anyone convicted of animal cruelty will be required to submit and keep updated their name, address, and photograph to the publicly searchable database for five years following their conviction. Convicted abusers will have to pay $50 annually for the cost of the registry, and those who do not face a $1,000 fine and one year imprisonment.
Mr. Cooper is quoted stating, “We know the correlation between animal abuse and domestic violence…Almost every serial killer starts out by torturing animals, so in a strange sense we could end up protecting the lives of people.” In acknowledging the link between animal abuse and domestic violence, a relationship of which many people are not aware, Mr. Cooper illustrates how animal protection laws can serve both human and animal interests.
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal law, animal rights, animal welfare | Tagged: activism, ALDF, animal abuse, animal advocacy, animal law, animal rights, animal suffering, animal welfare, animals, california, cats, dog fighting, dogs, feminism, Jon Cooper, Megan's Law, New Jersey, New York, pet stores, registry, shelters, Suffolk County | 5 Comments »