My own private Idaho: Pursuing ag-gag secrecy

ht_cow_drag_mi_130128_wmain

Bumps and bruises: The “inadvertent cruelty” of factory farming. Mercy for Animals Idaho dairy photo; click image

Kathleen Stachowski  Other Nations

“My Own Private Idaho.” You might know it as a ’90s era movie, but its new identity is being forged in the Idaho legislature right now. “My Own Private Idaho” could soon be how factory farm owners refer to their holdings–places where anything goes and no one knows–if ag-gag legislation is signed into law. But according to some, it goes far beyond undercover filming in animal agriculture settings.

Ag-gag got a thorough spanking in state legislatures last year. The bills died well-deserved, good deaths–guess you could say they were euthanized–in 11 states. But all bets are off where Idaho is concerned; the Senate voted 23-10 in favor of SB 1337 (find the bill text here) and sent it on to the House. The bill’s sponsor, GOP Senator Jim Patrick, is an American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) minion, according to SourceWatch. I’ll wait while you grab the smelling salts.

solid-state1

How do these differ from cows? Click image.

Says Patrick, “The problem we have here is you can be tried and convicted in the press or on YouTube. You don’t go out to Micron and take pictures. It’s against the law” (source: Boise Weekly). In case you didn’t know, Boise’s Micron Techology, Inc. designs and builds memory and semiconductor technologies. So let’s see now: cows … semiconductors … nah, I don’t see a difference either.

Another Republican, Sen. Jim Rice, agreed with Patrick, calling the legislation an “anti-attack the innocent bill.” The innocent–in case you’re justifiably confused–are not the animals or the undercover justice-seekers, but the factory farms. Seriously, you can’t make this stuff up.

Idaho’s push for ag-gag legislation comes in the wake of a 2012 Mercy for Animals undercover investigation of Bettencourt Dairies (a Burger King supplier), where egregious abuse of cows was recorded (be prepared to stop the video, which plays automatically, if you prefer to read the text first). In response to the subsequent ag-gag legislation, Mercy for Animals released more undercover video just a few days ago, this time revealing sexual abuse of a cow (for those special occasions when garden-variety cruelty just won’t do). The dairy’s response to the most recent video included the lame excuse that bad-actor employees might lie on their job applications, along with its endorsement of both the bill and animal protection…however that works.

One natural resource, environmental policy, and political specialist from Idaho cautions that the bill is much broader and more dangerous than many are perceiving it to be, that it “goes light years beyond merely preventing access and photography of large animal operations such as dairies or beef production” in its expansive definition of “agricultural production facility.” It even seems to include public land: “Agricultural production facility” means any structure or land, whether privately or publicly owned, leased or operated, that is being used for agricultural production. Further, enterprises like fur farming are protected in this definition of “agricultural production”:

Breeding, hatching, raising, producing, feeding and keeping livestock, dairy animals, swine, furbearing animals, poultry, eggs, fish and other aquatic species, and other animals, animal products and animal byproducts, animal waste, animal compost, and bees, bee products and bee byproducts…
~SB 1337 text

Are puppy mills protected in this definition? Predator-killing contests? Is someone asking these questions?

So just how warped is the baseline attitude for what’s acceptable treatment of animals in Idaho? (Remember–this is the state that recently exterminated two wolf packs deep within federal wilderness because wolves kill and eat some of the elk that Idaho hunters want to kill.) An editorial that seems to oppose the legislation in a tepid kind of way (“we should all expect that all animals are treated humanely”; “animals cannot speak up for themselves”) also expounds upon and excuses the “inadvertent cruelty” of industrial farming:

In the midst of all this animal production, some inadvertent cruelty occurs. You don’t pack animals in small cages or push herds into chutes without bumps and bruises. And we don’t wait for animals to die of natural causes before turning them into chops, steaks or wings. Idaho State Journal

“Bumps and bruises” from being “packed” into battery cages! “Bumps and bruises” from shocking sick, weak cows through chutes–maybe even dragging downers with chains and tractors! The “inadvertent cruelty” of factory farming–man, that just kills me!

No, wait–it kills them.
________________________________________________________________

  • Watch 34 minutes of ID Senate testimony in “Idaho “Ag-Gag” Debate: Supporters compare photographing animal cruelty to terrorism” on YouTube.
  • “United States of ALEC,” a Bill Moyers video
  • Find your own ALEC politicians here.
  • Factory farmed chickens in battery cages, here.
  • Go vegan–it’s the only thing that absolutely saves animals’ lives.

4 Responses

  1. Reblogged this on "OUR WORLD".

  2. “A bill to jail people who secretly film animal abuse at Idaho’s agricultural facilities is headed to Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter’s desk.”

    http://www.wisconsingazette.com/trending-news/idaho-advances-bill-to-jail-undercover-animal-welfare-activists.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,267 other followers

%d bloggers like this: