Posted on October 7, 2012 by othernations
Kathleen Stachowski Other Nations
You don’t have to be Catholic to appreciate the Blessing of the Animals offered by churches during October, usually near the Oct. 4th Feast Day of St. Francis of Assisi, patron saint of animals. In fact, non-Catholic denominations frequently conduct their own animal blessing services, and why not–what’s not to love?!? Heck, you don’t even have to be religious to find beauty in this simple, compassionate gesture. Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal rights, circuses, diet, factory farms, hunting, vivisection | 10 Comments »
Posted on April 21, 2012 by othernations
peta2.com-click on image
Kathleen Stachowski Other Nations
The Coast Guard motto is Sempre Paratus, “always ready.” We can rest assured that, when the need arises, they will indeed be ready to clip the legs off living goats using tree branch trimmers. They’ve apparently undergone rigorous training in Virginia to perform this very act.
A whistleblower caught the heinous deed on video and PETA released it. The Coast Guard is defending the use of live animals in combat medical training, saying,
“Animals used in trauma training are supported and monitored by well-trained, experienced veterinary staff to ensure that appropriate anesthesia and analgesia prevent them from experiencing pain or distress.” Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal rights, vivisection | 6 Comments »
Posted on December 5, 2011 by David
The University of Pennsylvania houses as many as 5,000 animals a year at their medical and veterinary schools. Recently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture issued an official warning letter to the University of Pennsylvania for its “failure to establish programs of adequate veterinary care” for some of its research animals. Over a course of three years, reports have stated, that the Ivy League institution may be responsible for up to 115 violations of the Animal Welfare Act. The inspections also noted that, “two dogs had interdigital cysts (often from standing on wire flooring); dirty and algae-filled water containers for four horses, and three gerbil deaths that occurred because of ‘unsuitable sipper tubes.” In another incident at Penn, a newborn puppy was found dead, trapped beneath a floor grate. The puppy had slipped through the grate unnoticed, and an unknown amount of time passed before his death.
The University of Pennsylvania had more than double the amount of violations in comparison to other Ivy League schools. The Agriculture Department, which regulates research facilities that use animals, and the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) found that the eight Ivy League universities had what it called “disturbingly high numbers of Animal Welfare Act violations,” many of which were repeat or severe. Despite these violations, the University of Pennsylvania continues to receive the highest amount of federal research funding among all Ivy League Schools. According to PCRM, University of Pennsylvania received $1.4 billion from the National Institutes of Health since 2008 for researching. Continue reading
Filed under: animal experimentation, animal law, vivisection | Tagged: animal abuse, animal advocacy, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal law, animal suffering, animal welfare, PCRM, University of Pennsylvania, vivisection | 4 Comments »
Posted on November 30, 2011 by David
Yesterday I received an email with a picture of cats that were force-fed toilet cleaner by Proctor and Gamble – an example of animal testing of the type that goes on every day. The photo was posted by the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), an umbrella entity that many view as a fringe and frightening network of individuals who are willing to save animals in testing facilities by taking steps that are prohibited by society such as property destruction etc. (ALF’s guidelines insist that all precautions be taken to make sure no animals or humans are harmed when any destruction occurs, but the fact remains that arson and similar activities are carried out at times). I have seen other information posted by ALF, perhaps the most disturbing being the story of Britches, a newborn monkey stolen from his mother for a study on “maternal deprivation” and whose eyes were sewn shut to study “sight deprivation.” He was kept in what appeared to be a shut cabinet and given none of the affection a young animal requires. Members of ALF saved him and, watching the video, I’ll freely admit that I saw them as the heroes of the story despite their reputation. Continue reading
Filed under: AETA, animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal law, vivisection | Tagged: AETA, ALF, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal law, Animal Liberation Front, animal suffering, animal testing, vivisection | 14 Comments »
Posted on August 15, 2010 by David
Well, I’m back from vacation and I have a few things to report. First, one of my favorite places: “Milsurp’s Surplus and More” has closed. I have no idea what they sold there, never having ventured in. Still, just knowing there was a place that was able to differentiate between surplus and more made me sleep better and wake with a smile. Now I’ll have to look elsewhere for my reason for being. Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal welfare, vivisection | Tagged: Al Franken, animal abuse, animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal suffering, animal welfare, Bill Richardson, chimpanzees, Gene Hackman, National Institutes of Health, NIH, Rob Schneider, San Antonio, vivisection | 1 Comment »
Posted on August 1, 2010 by David
I’ve been bothered by this article in U.S.A. Today since I read it. The article, which talks about the rescue and subsequent adoption of some 120 beagles who were vivisected, has the typical feel-good, happy-ending narrative one often sees in articles of this type. And don’t get me wrong; I’m delighted that the dogs were rescued and it is certainly a much better ending than anyone had any reason to expect for them.
Still, I found one passage especially haunting: Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal welfare, vivisection | Tagged: animal abuse, animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal suffering, animal welfare, barbarism, beagles, dogs, lab animals, pets, societal dysfunction, U.S.A. Today, vivisection | 5 Comments »
Posted on April 19, 2010 by David
We´re in the middle of World Week for Animals, during which people the world over speak out against vivisection.
People often point to the need for animal experimentation to alleviate human suffering. Putting aside the basic objection to torturing one sentient creature for the benefit of another, the premise lacks foundation. Animal models have always been the path of least resistance. To justifiably claim such experiments are necessary requires evidence that those seeking to carry out the experiments have unsuccessfully attempted to learn what they seek through other means. Assuming the absence of other means, necessity would also require, at minimum, a good faith attempt to create one. To date, precious little resources have been expended to create alternatives to animal experiments and, when such options exist, they are often ignored. Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal law, animal welfare, vivisection | Tagged: animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal experimentation, animal law, animal suffering, animal welfare, vivisection, World Week for Animals | 6 Comments »