I want to say a brief word about animal rights. Or rather I want to say a brief word what they are not about. The media often brands advocacy organizations opposing the mistreatment of nonhumans as “animal rights groups” regardless of the groups’ actual purpose or philosophy. For example, here discussing opposition to the proposed “euthanization” of thousands of wild mustangs, the Washington Post lumps the American Wild Horses Preservation Campaign (among others) under the rubric of animals rights groups. The AWHPC is an umbrella organization for 45 groups, most of which are far more concerned with horses not dying than with the nature and scope of horses’ moral or legal claims.
Furthermore, the WaPo also tells us that Madeleine Pickens, wife of billionaire oilman, T. Boone Pickens, intervened and pledged to save the horses. I feel confident opining that Ms. Pickens does not consider herself an animal rights activist. My guess: she just likes horses. Not being animal rights-oriented doesn’t make Ms. Pickens a bad person or the AWHPC a bad organization anymore than not being a pear makes an apple a bad fruit. They are just different.
I intend to write more about how animal advocates of all stripes as well as the causes they champion get routinely marginalized through this type of careless rhetoric. If animal rights are to mean something, they cannot mean everything. Codifying what animal rights do mean, however, is a post for another day.
Update, March 2009: It is not looking good for the Pickens-funded sanctuary.