This article about how the British Free Range Egg Producers Association encourages consumers to eat smaller eggs has been getting a fair amount of play (including this post at Feminist Law Professors). The producers note that (for obvious biological reasons) it is harder and more painful for a hen to lay a large egg than a small or medium sized one.
One could hardly quibble with the notion that laying large eggs causes more stress to the hen. It bears emphasizing, however, that this recommendation comes from the British Free Range Egg Producers Association. Whatever one thinks of the efficacy of free range (some varying views, here, here and here), both in the US and abroad, the practice has at its goal a less stressful environment for the hens (though it still involves the mass killing of male chicks). If one is consuming factory farmed eggs, the size of the eggs doesn’t matter a whit. The hens that lay the eggs live in battery cage hell for as long as it takes for them to become utterly spent, following which they get discarded like garbage (except that there are so many of them it has created a disposal problem). Worrying about egg size when the animals endure conditions whose cruelty defies the imagination is like worrying about a blood blister on a sucking chest wound.
Filed under: animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal law, animal welfare | Tagged: animal abuse, animal cruelty, animal law, animal suffering, animal welfare, animals, battery cages, chickens, egg production, factory farms, free range, free range eggs, hens, industrial farming |