Washington State University assigned Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma to all incoming freshmen as required summer reading. The idea: to spur a debate about industrial agriculture and its impact on American society. Great idea, right? I guess not. Citing “budget constraints,” the university has withdrawn the book.
According to this article in the Chronicle of Higher Education (pay site, but you can get a cheap day pass…), not everyone buys the administration’s explanation for this turnabout, especially since the university had already purchased 4,000 copies of the book.
The article notes:
“What we were told is that when the committee picked The Omnivore’s Dilemma, because of the politics of the agriculture industry, we would not be having a common reading, and that President Floyd decided that this was not a battle he wanted to wage,” said one person who had knowledge of the program and asked not to be named because of fear of job loss.
Jeff Sellen, an instructor at the university who sat on a committee in charge of implementing the reading program, says members of that panel were told “we could not call it a ‘common reading.'”
“I think that was important because it would be less official and would maybe fly underneath the radar,” he says. “It was obvious that it was political.”
I don’t know what the reason(s) were; I only know what I read. But I sure wish those Washington State freshmen were reading this book…
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: animal law, animal welfare, factory farms, farmed animals, industrial agriculture, industrial farming, Michael Pollan, Omnivore's Dilemma, Washington State University |