This was a very productive 5 day meeting of GEIG. In addition to attending some fine discussions and papers over the last several days, I also officially joined the IUCN CEL Ethics Specialist Group, something I mistakenly thought I had done in Barcelona at the IUCN Congress back in the fall. The IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) is the world’s largest NGO and the oldest environmental organization in the world. The Commission on Environmental Law (CEL) is a subsidiary organization of the IUCN and the Ethics Specialist Group (ESG) forms a subgroup of the CEL. The ESG wishes to add animal rights to its agenda, a development about which I could not be more happy.
The IUCN (the parent organization – not the CEL) has traditionally excluded animal organizations from membership because their aims do not align with those of the Species Survival Group, a powerful constituency within the IUCN, which advocates for traditional hunting. As I mentioned a while back, I believe this policy of exclusion serves only those who oppose a diverse environmental agenda. Environmentalists do not agree on everything but we share a common goal. Given the stakes, we would be wise to focus on the areas where we agree rather than where we differ. Part of my mission for the next few years involves working to open the IUCN to animal groups and to the vision such organizations bring to the world’s environmental agenda.
I feel very good about joining the ESG and even better about the warm welcome my animal advocacy agenda received. The larger IUCN moves slowly (it convenes only quadrennially) but this is important work and I am willing to (try to) be patient.
Filed under: animal ethics, animal law, animal rights, animal welfare, IUCN | Tagged: animal advocacy, animal ethics, animal law, animal rights, animal welfare, Commission on Environmental Law, environmental advocacy, environmental law, environmentalism, GEIG, IUCN, IUCN Ethics Specialist Group |