From the Stuff You Probably Thought Was Too Obvious to Have to Sue About Desk:
A district court in Washington D.C. has struck down a Bush Era U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service rule that allowed canned hunting of endangered species. Canned hunting is the shooting of semi-tame animals on fenced “ranches” (see here for some previous posts). During canned excursions, the animals have nowhere to run — even if they knew they were in danger — and thus can be slaughtered with ease. Such “hunts” require no skill (indeed, many “ranches” offer a guaranteed kill). Reviled by most hunters, they are primarily the province of folks like Dick Cheney and his fellow “sportsmen.”
The Endangered Species Act, Section 9 makes it illegal to “take” any animal on the endangered species list. Yet, among the animals FWS allowed to be canned and killed were the scimitar-horned oryx, addax and dama gazelle, all endangered African species. Thus the lawsuit.
To the chagrin of the Safari Club and their ilk, the court found that charging “sportsmen” big bucks to shoot endangered animals violates the Endangered Species Act. Kudos to the Humane Society, Defenders of Wildlife, Born Free USA, Kimya Institute and several others for forcing the courts to state the obvious and thus stop at least this part of the slaughter. Read the HSUS press release here and the Safari Club’s Orwellian spin on how killing these animals actually protects them here.
Filed under: animal law, canned hunting, hunting Tagged: | animal abuse, animal advocacy, animal ethics, animal law, animal welfare, Born Free USA, canned hunting, Defenders of Wildlife, Endangered Species Act, environmental advocacy, environmental law, environmentalism, exotic animals, Fish & Wildlife Service, HSUS, Humane Society, hunting, Kimya Institute, Safari Club