Santos was interesting. First, who knew there was a significant mountain range between Rio & Sao Paulo? Even having flown this route many times, I was surprised by the size and extent of the range which we drove over.
My talk on biofuels, industrial agriculture and climate change was well-received in an odd but increasingly common way. Though I mentioned animal treatment only tangentially and concentrated on the massive pollution and climate change culpability of factory farming, 90% of the questions and comments I received dwelt on animal treatment and even animal rights.
This has happened to me in various countries and at various times. The more I emphasize environmental externalities relating to animal treatment, the more audience members want to focus on (and critique) animal treatment. I´m still working on the proper response to this phenomenon and welcome your thoughts.
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal ethics, animal law, animal rights, animal scholarship, animal welfare, climate change, environmental ethics, environmental law, factory farms Tagged: | animal advocacy, animal law, animal suffering, animal welfare, biofuels, Brazil, CAFOS, climate change, environmental advocacy, environmental ethics, environmental law, environmentalism, factory farms, farmed animals, global warming, industrial farming, pollution, Santos