Obama and the Endangered Species Act

Gillian Lyons

During his campaign, Obama’s campaign spokesman noted that,  “as president, Senator Obama will fight to maintain the strong protections of the Endangered Species Act.”  Just a few months after taking office, this statement rang true, when the Obama administration reversed the Bush administration’s eleventh-hour regulation which circumvented Endangered Species Act mandates by allowing federal agencies to make their own determination as to whether their projects would harm endangered species, without having to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service.  According to Carl Pope, former executive director of the Sierra Club, this move by the Obama administration brought science back into the Endangered Species decision-making process, and numerous environmental groups hailed the move as a major protective step for threatened species.  

Unfortunately, since that time, Obama and his Administration haven’t fought to maintain strong protections of the Endangered Species Act.  In February 2010, the Administration proposed budget cuts which would reduce funding for listing, recovery, conservation and enforcement programs under the Endangered Species Act.  And, in comparison to Clinton’s administration’s 498 species listings (62 per year), and George H. Bush’s administration’s 231 species listings (58 per year) the Obama administration listed only 2 during the president’s first year in office. According to the Center for Biological Diversity, these numbers have improved in the last year, with the Administration finalizing protection for 51 species from Hawaii.  CBD, notes, however, that protection has only been finalized for one plant, and proposed for 15 species in the contiguous United States.

Responding to the Administration’s dragging of their feet, the Center for Biological Diversity recently filed suit against the Fish and Wildlife Service challenging the agency’s failure to list over 100 species within legally required timelines.  While there’s no saying whether the Center for Biological Diversity will succeed in their suit, we can say one thing for sure: Obama has not fought to maintain strong protections as it was claimed he would during his campaign.  Another idle political promise, it seems.

4 Responses

  1. thats a total bummer

  2. There’s so much that needs to be done. Too many species are also being declared “worth protecting” or “deserving protection,” but there’s no money for it. Sad.

  3. Montana has one lone congressman in the House of Representatives–just one, for our large but sparsely populated state. He’s a rabid right-winger whose recent tactics involve whipping his base into a slobbering frenzy against wolves. He’s made references to “having to” shoot, shovel, and shut-up, and has recently appeared at a Safari Club gathering to assail the ESA. The ugly details are here
    http://missoulian.com/news/local/article_f5fe2fae-d8d7-11df-8f2e-001cc4c002e0.html The comments posted to it are even uglier.

    Here’s another non sequitur. I saw my first fisher (mustelid) last weekend on a remote mountain road. Wow! I’ve never yet seen a wolverine. Montana still allows the TRAPPING of fishers and wolverines, even while listing them at the state level as ‘species of concern.’ Both should be listed under the ESA.

  4. Sadly, the protection of endangered species just isn’t considered a priority,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: