What would you do if one day, after letting your beloved Husky, Niko, play outside for two hours, you went to get him from the backyard but he wasn’t there? First, you would probably search the neighborhood, followed by checking the local pounds and posting signs in hopes that all of these efforts would bring your lost Niko home. Thinking to yourself “how bizarre”, after letting Niko play outside in your fenced in backyard for 6 years, “why now would he decide to run away?” As you go down the list of possibilities; “did he chase a squirrel, did I leave the gate open, did he jump the fence”, what happened to Niko?
Two days go by and you see a “LOST DOG” sign near the local post office, but its not for Niko, its for Bishop, another Husky in the neighborhood. “Well that’s weird,” you think to yourself about the coincidence that two Huskies would go missing from the same neighborhood within the same week. What about the next few days when your friend at the grocery store tells you that her sister’s Husky, Layla, went missing the night before after being let out for her nightly exercise. Is this still a coincidence?
You know it sounds like a conspiracy theory, but you start to think of all those rumors you have heard about the dog nappers stealing dogs and selling them for use in research labs. Could this have happened to Niko? Bishop? Layla? Why are all of the Huskies in the neighborhood missing? Are they really lying on tables being prodded and poked with needles, being sprayed in the eyes with poisonous product, or worse, being induced with heart attacks in open heart surgery sans anesthetic?
Unfortunately for thousands of pet owners in the early 60’s, these “conspiracy theories” were, in fact, actual living nightmares. As millions of dogs were being used for research, a demand for specific breeds led to an increase of dogs bought from “Class B” dealers. Class B dealers, also known as random source dealers, are licensed by the USDA to purchase their animals from a multitude of different sources, including pound seizure, dog auctions, stolen dogs, and misrepresenting themselves as adopters from “Free to Good Home” ads. However, in the early 60’s, the USDA did not regulate animals used in research, nor did they regulate Class B dealers, who purchased or stole and sold animals for use in research labs.
The animals were collected by “bunchers” and sold to the dealers. In a detailed account of the inner workings of Class B dealers, the book Stolen for Profit, describes bunchers as “an inventive lot” who “devise various techniques for culling dogs and cats: stun guns, a bitch in heat, high pitched whistles…and even posed as Animal Control officers and went from house to house duping residents into giving up their cats which supposedly had a contagious virus.” Employing such scandalous tactics ensured that the Class B dealers could provide numerous dogs of the specific breed in demand to the lab. Animals that are people’s pets, as described in the book, “are ideal in laboratories since they are accustomed to being handled by people,” an excuse used to justify why labs preferred people’s companion animals.
As thousands of animals went missing in the 60’s, countless numbers of owners reported their dogs and cats missing. They received nothing but a “too bad” or empty promises from law enforcement to help them. Even when reports were made that the animal had been stolen, pet owners were ignored and law enforcement looked at the idea that animals were being stolen right out of people’s backyards as just another crazy conspiracy.
The public was in a state of shock after Life Magazine ran its article titled, “Concentration Camp for Dogs” exposing the horrifying life of America’s stolen friends at Class B dealers. The article revealed pictures of emaciated dogs, “too weak to crawl to the frozen entrails scattered” in the yard, puppies frozen inside of boxes, and dogs chained to cars unable to move and sitting in their own waste. The explicit images exposed the sight for what it was, a dismal abyss where no signs of life existed. Animals lay dead one on top of the other, from suffocation in cramped cages, frozen animals chained to junkyard garbage, too helpless to live through the cold, and skeletal bags of bones unable to even get to the scraps of stale bread rotting in the corners of the yard. What people thought was a conspiracy theory turned out to be a hellish nightmare, these were people’s pets. After the article was released, three lucky owners were reunited with their pets, but for the rest of the country, their worst fears were confirmed; their pets very well could be in conditions like this, or at that point, lying on a research table.
There was no more hiding or covering up what was going in the business of Class B dealers, the truth had been revealed. More people responded to this Life article than to any other Life article released, including those about the Vietnam War. The article sparked outrage in millions of Americans, and was the driving force that led to the passage of the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. The public had spoken, Congress had been pressured into taking action and the Animal Welfare Act was signed into law on August 24, 1966, setting the standards for the care of animals to be used in research.
The 1966 law required dealers and laboratories to be licensed and provide identification of their animals. However, there were many deficiencies in the law including the fact that the law only covered dealers who were funded by the government or dealers that dealt across state lines, and only pertained to animals were being held for research but not to animals already in the lab. By 1970, the law had been amended to include inter-state as well as in-state dealings, giving the USDA a wider coverage over dealers, and also required the use of tranquilizers during painful experiments. There have been various amendments to the Animal Welfare Act, since its passing, like the 1990 amendment that required shelters to hold animals for at least 5 days to allow recovery of lost pets, but unfortunately, the USDA has not done a thorough job ensuring Class B dealers are following protocol.
Despite the USDA’s power to license and regulate Class B dealers, there are still currently 9 registered class B dealers, licensed by the USDA. Many problems occurring in the 60’s are still issues today, such as bunchers, and the inhumane conditions at Class B dealers. Legally, bunchers are allowed to sell the animals as long as they can prove that the animal was bred for research, but that is rarely the case. More often than not, bunchers offer falsified paperwork and the dealers turn the other cheek. The USDA is responsible for checking dealer records but for reasons such as the inability to prove false papers, the USDA continues to license Class B dealers.
According to the 2010 GAO report, the USDA is inadequately overseeing the Class B dealers by neglecting to report numerous violations, neglecting to issue heavy fines, and lacking in the number of penalties issued for violations. Enforcement of the laws set forth by the AWA is an issue that still concerns the welfare of animals in custody of Class B dealers, which today, are still very much up and running in frighteningly similar conditions as the past.