Animal Abuser Registry Laws: NY is First, but Shouldn’t all States Jump on the Bandwagon?

Ally Bernstein

Last month, with a unanimous vote by the Legislature, Albany County became the third county in New York, and the Nation, to require persons convicted of misdemeanor or felony animal cruelty charges to register on the animal abuse registry. According to “Local Law K,” first time offenders will remain on the registry for 10 years and second time offenders will remain there for life and will be prohibited from owning an animal while on the registry. Other provisions of the law will subject offenders to fines and and other punishments for failure to comply.

    According to the Albany Times Union, the laws passed were followed by enthusiastic applause from the legislatures, apparently an “unusual move” after new laws are passed. Lead sponsor, Bryan Clenahan stated, “We know that animal abusers are the same people who commit violent acts toward children and other innocent victims in our community. By taking a stronger approach to animal abuse, we are working to create a safer, more peaceful community for pets and people alike.” Interestingly, this statement reflects that the law was created in order to further the protection of the children and other innocent victims, based on the correlations related to animal abuse and abuse to humans. However, whatever the case may be for why the laws were adopted, they are a major step in the prevention of animal abuse.

The gist of the law was to ensure animals were not adopted/sold to abusers by making the public aware of who these people are, but is this sufficient?  With only three registries in the nation, what are the real safeguards against abuse for the thousands of strays that could easily be picked up by an abuser, or the chances that a seriously ill abuser won’t move to a county where there is no registry? In order to make this a real safeguard for animals, the registry laws need to be nationwide so that the abusers have no shield of registry-free counties to hide in.

What about the stigma attached to those who register? Will it be similar to that of those who register on a sex offender list? Everyone knows the stigma of a sex offender in the neighborhood, no one wants them there, everyone hates them, and no one wants to hire them. Is an animal abuser going to be subject to these mental hardships? What about those who are charged for negligently abusing an animal? For instance, the homeowner who leaves town whose cat eats all of the food in one day, even though enough food and water was provided for the week. Should these people be subject to the registry?

Although animal abuse is not child abuse, it is still a heinous crime, and the purpose of these laws is to crack down on, and prevent, the abuse. Although there will be certain stigmas attached to those who must register, the purpose of deterrence outweighs the small chances that those who do not deserve to be on the registry will be judged by the community. These laws aim to protect from further abuse to animals and reflect an intolerance for the crimes. More counties and states should jump on the bandwagon and adopt similar laws in order to expand the zone of coverage. Recently, Hawaii introduced similar bills hoping to achieve the same levels of protections and hopefully, others will soon follow. Only nationwide strength will help close the umbrella of registry-free zones that animal abusers have to hide under.

9 Responses

  1. Wow. I am so glad that this law passed, and other states other than NY should also pass laws such as this.

    Yes, it is not child abuse, but like you said, it IS a heinous crime and people need to learn and know that animals have rights and you can not abuse them without getting away with it.

    Thank you for sharing this. I am just so happy to learn that the government is finally wrapping their heads around animal rights.

  2. This is a move based in sound reason and good-heartedness.

    There is a strong sentiment against animal abuse, and virtually all people of good will wish to help prevent it.

    There’s also the pragmatic side, having to do with public safety. Chronic abuse and/or torture of animals does reflect a dangerous pathology, that has been linked as a precursor to such things as child abuse, or even serial murder.

  3. Jeffrey Dahmer abused and tortured animals. Imagine if this law had been around sooner and his employers and neighbors had known about it? Maybe lives could have been saved?

  4. Great job NY, hope this will spread to all counties there and all other 49 states. You have to wonder about people that don’t see animal cruelty as a big thing. The next time you run into someone like that ask them if they would want their children or grandchildren anywhere near someone that has abused an animal. Even if they say yes, their body language says otherwise.

  5. […] Animal Abuser Registry Laws: NY is First, but Shouldn't all States … Last month, with a unanimous vote by the Legislature, Albany County became the third county in New York, and the Nation, to require persons convicted of misdemeanor or felony animal cruelty charges to register on the … Source: animalblawg.wordpress.com […]

  6. Yes, the registries help shelters avoid adopting out to abusers, and yes, the registry allows neighbors to know if one of their neighbors has a dangerous predisposition. But I think everyone is overlooking what I consider another reason why these registries are of tremendous value to the public.

    Do you have a dog? Ever leave the dog unattended in the backyard for even a little while? Have an indoor/outdoor cat? Wouldn’t you like to know if your neighbor is an abuser? I think there is huge value in public knowledge of these things, so that individuals can be fully informed and prevent what could have been a potential tragedy. I know I will be looking up my sister and parents’ neighbors in Suffolk County, NY, to make sure their pets are safe.

  7. I hate to be a naysayer, but having spoken with numerous prosecutors that work on animal cruelty cases they think that these registries will actually hinder rather than help the fight. In places where the registries exist, many defense attorneys will be convincing their clients to plead to crimes that will not place them on the registries- for instance, if someone set a dog on fire they would plead guilty to arson rather than animal cruelty such that they wouldn’t be placed on a registry and have their names forever linked in the public with their crimes. This will actually lessen convictions for animal cruelty, thereby lessening the need for the registries in the first place.

    Just a thought.

  8. i think this is a good idea but it is not enough,

  9. Animal abusers of every kind need to be listed on registrys across the nation. We are way pass time on saving animals from abuse !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: