Posted on December 29, 2013 by Other Nations
Vegan Peace e-cards: click image
Kathleen Stachowski Other Nations
One last hurrah is on the holiday season horizon–the New Year’s celebration. The holidays (regardless of which ones you celebrate) are a time fraught with pitfalls for ethical vegans in a speciesist world. Gifts…food…gifts of food…argh.
Food. You can always detect the vegan at the omnivore holiday party, surreptitiously rifling through the pasta salad with a serving spoon, attempting to determine if it’s “safe.” Likewise, the vegan (or veg*n) is the one whose face brightens at the sight of a huge salad bowl then darkens upon realizing that the lovely greens are covered with crumbled bacon. And bacon vinaigrette. Tsk.
Then there’s the gift-giving, and by that I really mean the gift-receiving. Because you can bet your Moo Shoes that ethical vegans give vegan gifts but don’t always receive them. Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal rights, animal welfare, diet, factory farms, veganism, vegetarianism | 5 Comments »
Posted on December 29, 2013 by David
When married couples divorce, who gets to keep the dog? Under the law, dogs are considered to be personal property, and no matter how loved dogs are, they are not treated like children under the law. Many judges do not want to get involved in pet disputes. The family pet sometimes becomes a powerless victim of the breakup. Recently, courts have been ruling dog custody at other forms than property. In the New York Post on December 4, 2013 there was an article about a pair of divorcing women about to fight it out in court over a miniature dachshund named Joey. It will be New York’s first matrimonial pet-custody case. The attorney for one of the women, Sherri Donovan said, “It recognizes the special place of pets in our families.”
Manhattan Justice Matthew Cooper opines in his ruling granting the women oral arguments. According to the article, the only bone of contention in their divorce is who will get sole custody of their 2-year-old pet, Joey. One of the women gave Joey as a gift to the other women, which she claims always sleeps on her side of the bed. Judge Cooper notes that New York law lags behind other states’ legal standing of their pets, and that “most pet owners would not trade their pets for even $1 million in cash.” The judge will schedule a hearing to determine Joey’s fate, instead of regarding him like a piece of property. Judge Cooper wants to hear the truth about who bore the major responsibility for meeting Joey’s needs. He will be asking questions such as: “Who spent more time with Joey on a regular basis?” The judge says, “…there is certainly room to give real consideration to a case involving a treasured pet.” The parties are still working out a date for the hearing. Continue reading
Filed under: animal law | Tagged: animal law, animal welfare, dog custody cases, pet custody laws | 6 Comments »
Posted on December 20, 2013 by David
An issue that plagues animal rights advocates is something we, as people, take for granted: standing to sue. In order to find standing, generally three factors must be found: 1) injury-in-fact, 2) causation, and 3) redressability. Unfortunately for animals, courts do not recognize the injury of an animal alone to give that animal standing, even though their rights have been violated.
Standing to sue is an issue recognized around the world. The Filipino case Minors Oposa was considered a ground-breaking case, and its affect felt around the world. In Minors Oposa the high court of the Philippines expressed their willingness to recognize the standing of not just minors, but future generations not yet born. This was done in an attempt to protect future generations’ right to a balanced and healthful ecology. Though this may seem like a wild idea, suing on behalf of future generations, it makes sense. When harm is being done, the affected parties should have their interests protected, even if someone else has to bring the action. Continue reading
Filed under: animal law | Tagged: animal advocacy, animal law, animal rights, legal standing for animals, standing to sue | 1 Comment »
Posted on December 19, 2013 by David
“What a country chooses to save is what a country says about itself,” Mollie Beattie, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director 1993-1996.
Forty years ago this month, Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). When signing the ESA into law on December 28, 1973, President Nixon stated, “Nothing is more priceless and more worthy of preservation than the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed. It is a many-faceted treasure, of value to scholars, scientists, and nature lovers alive, and it forms a vital part of the heritage we all share as Americans.” Continue reading
Filed under: animal law | Tagged: animal ethics, animal law, animal welfare, Endangered Species Act, environmental law, ESA | 1 Comment »
Posted on December 19, 2013 by Other Nations
Click image for photo credit
Kathleen Stachowski Other Nations
(NOTE: See my updates scattered throughout the text & comment section)
Cry “Havoc!” There will be blood…and it will be wolf blood.
Idaho Fish and Game (IDFG) has hired a killer to slaughter two wolf packs within the federally-protected Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness. This is congressionally-designated, captital-W wilderness, certainly the one place nature should be allowed to express itself without manipulation by and for humans. Said wolf biologist and PBS filmmaker (“River of No Return”) Isaac Babcock,
…when Fish and Game hires a bounty hunter to go live in designated wilderness in a Forest Service cabin with the goal of eliminating entire wolf packs — something seems terribly wrong with that.” ~ Idaho Statesman: “Idaho Fish and Game turns to hired hunter“
Why must two wilderness wolf packs die? Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal rights, environmental ethics, hunting | Tagged: Idaho, Montana, trapping, wilderness, Wilderness Act, wolves | 14 Comments »
Posted on December 18, 2013 by David
On Wednesday, November 27th, President Obama signed into law a bipartisan bill to support the retirement of research chimpanzees.
Earlier this year, the National Institute of Health (NIH) announced plans to retire about 90 percent of U.S. government-owned chimpanzees currently used in medical research to Chimp Haven, a national chimpanzee sanctuary in Keithville, Louisiana. However, the Chimpanzee Health Improvement, Maintenance and Protection (CHIMP) Act, signed into law in 2000, placed a $30 million cap on spending for federally owned chimpanzees in sanctuaries. NIH was expected to reach that cap in mid-November, affecting both the retirement and care of chimpanzees in laboratories and at Chimp Haven. Continue reading
Filed under: animal ethics, animal law | Tagged: animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal law, animal suffering, Chimp Haven, chimps, vivisection | 4 Comments »
Posted on December 13, 2013 by David
In January of 2010, a Frederick County deputy, Timothy Brooks, drove to the home of Roger and Sandra Jenkins to serve a civil warrant on their son. The Jenkins’ chocolate Labrador retriever, Brandi, rushed out of the home towards the officers but stopped before getting very close. As Roger called for Brandi to return into the home, Deputy Brooks shot the dog and injured her leg. Brandi
recovered, but may have to have her leg amputated. In April of 2012, a jury awarded the Jenkins’ $620,000 in damages, $200,000 of which was for emotional distress. That award was later lowered to $607,500 because Maryland has a statutory limit of $7,500 for veterinary bills. Continue reading
Filed under: animal law | Tagged: animal law, animal welfare, companion dogs, dog shootings | 3 Comments »