Chipotle’s “Scarecrow”: A Call to Veganism?

Maeve Flanagan

             Recently, Chipotle released an animated short film designed to draw attention to the perils of processed food, while, of course, trying to get people to play the company’s new online game.  Chipotle, which was primarily owned by McDonalds until 2006, is known in the industry for its efforts to use organic ingredients and naturally raised animals in its menu.  The short film is certainly touching- there are images of adorable animated cows packed in tight crates and chickens being pumped with what are presumably hormones.  The main character, the Scarecrow, is working in a food processing factory as a repair man and gets a first hand look at these horrifying practices.  The Scarecrow returns home to his charming cottage to find that a pepper (could it be a chipotle pepper?) has grown in his garden.  He works hard in this newly

Chipotle scarecrowblossoming garden until he has enough food to open a stand in the city where he once worked.  But there’s something missing from the Scarecrow’s new restaurant- meat.

Chipotle does not claim to be a vegetarian or vegan restaurant, but in its advertisement, the Scarecrow’s restaurant, which is designed to mimic Chipotle itself, does not serve meat.  Some might say that it would have been more truthful to include a look at the “farm raised” animals Chipotle claims it uses.  Perhaps a glimpse at the contrasting conditions of a chemically laden chicken and a free range one could have urged people to stop buying processed meats.  But how much less charming would this little film be if it showed some comfortably raised, grass fed cows being hauled off to slaughter?  Abolitionists might actually appreciate Chipotle’s “Scarecrow,” as it seems to promote a vegan lifestyle by eliminating meat from the main character’s menu.  Or, Chipotle could just be portraying itself as a “sustainable” and “animal-friendly” alternative so that people feel more comfortable about eating at the restaurant, which Gary Francione posits.  Francione finds that the Chipotle ad is much more harmful than helpful to the abolitionist movement.

I suppose what is more important about “The Scarecrow” is the message people actually got out of it.  A Washington Post article, commenting on the Chipotle ad, said, “I know that Chipotle’s point is that they are conscientious, but “conscientious,” short of a chicken who hands you the knife herself with a hand-written note saying that she has achieved all her life goals, found peace, and is looking forward to rejoining her family, still doesn’t cut it after animation this cute. In fact, even that scenario is incredibly depressing.”  Shouldn’t it be depressing though, if we want to stop the exploitation of animals?  I don’t know if Chipotle was aiming for an “eat vegan” message, but I think it’s the impression many viewers got.  Could Chipotle be paving the way for a meatless fast food universe?  According to Gary Francione and some other skeptics, absolutely not.  But according to many others, including myself, it could be a vital stepping-stone in getting people to question what they are eating.

About these ads

5 Responses

  1. David, Why do you write that Scarecrow’s restaurant is vegan? This is implied but not stated and there is a bog black chicken silhouette (shade?) lurking to the side of the counter, which my reading of the text says suggests “happy meat”, thus mirroring Chipotle’s enabling myth and fostering its attempts to differentiate itself from chains which, like Chipotle itself, use CAFO sourced critters. John

  2. John,
    I assume you mean to address the post’s author? That would be a question for her.

  3. yes a well-done deceptive add. curious if i missed anything

  4. At first, I thought the film might be promoting substitute meat, as one of the products is labeled 100% BEEF-ISH, but that’s not to say the product contained no meat, as it wasn’t labeled vegan. It also wasn’t clear to me whether the Scarecrow was sad about using cows for food, or just about their confinement. So in sum, I don’t think the film supported vegan eating. And if Chipotle still prides itself in selling organic and “naturally” raised animals, I think it’s unlikely to be paving the way to meatless fast-food.

    Imo, films that promote “natural”/”humane”/etc. meat cause harm to the animals themselves, as well as to the animal rights movement.

  5. […] Our thanks to Animal Blawg, where this post originally appeared on October 9, […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,319 other followers

%d bloggers like this: