Posted on January 22, 2016 by David
Disclaimer: First of all, as they will be treated certain thorny issues, I want to make clear that the views, arguments and reasons that are going to be exposed on this post are not the opinions of this blog or the ones of the author.
The reason that has made me move to deliver this issues is because they make an interesting (and original) approach of how the animal welfare can be understood, that I had never thought about. However, I am not trying to protect bullfighting but I want to introduce you these ideas, that might make us think about whether what we had for terrible, is as bad as we thought. Needless to say that I will try to deliver them in the most objective manner possible.
The arguments that I will be writing about are from a source that might be the speaker of the world of bullfighting in general: Pablo Hermoso de Mendoza, a very famous former Spanish Rejoneador (a kind of bullfighter that jumps into the arena on horseback).
(All the following arguments and statements are taken from this video: Argumentos a favor de los toros del rejoneador Pablo Hermoso de Mendoza.)
Bullfighters understand people who are not in favor of bullfighting, they understand Continue reading
Filed under: animal advocacy, animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal law | Tagged: animal abuse, animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal suffering, bullfighting | 3 Comments »
Posted on December 10, 2015 by David
Michael Dorf, Steve Wise and I are featured extensively in this WaPo article discussing personhood in the context of artificial intelligence and the U.S. political system.
Filed under: animal ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged: legal personhood, personhood | 1 Comment »
Posted on December 8, 2015 by animalblawg
For centuries animals have been used for experiments in the name of science. Scientists have urged the general public that these experiments are necessary, for the advancement of medical and scientific discovery. These scientists believe that without using nonhumans, there would be no way for us to know if the drugs or research discovered, would work or be safe for human use. This argument is flawed in many respects, but none more than the fact that nonhumans simply are not humans. Many of the experiments that bring desired results on animals does not necessarily bring the same results for humans. Actually this is the case way more often than not, with a vast majority of experiments that bring desired results in animals, but resulting in either adverse or no effect on humans. This then bears the question; why do we still use animals in scientific experiments and medical research? There really isn’t a good reason based on the facts. Researches and certain companies want us to believe that these experiments are necessary for our safety, but in reality these experiments are used by companies and researchers to hedge their liability, so that if anything does actually go wrong on the humans that use their products, they can show the results from the animal Continue reading
Filed under: animal ethics, animal law, Uncategorized | Tagged: animal abuse, animal experimentation, animal law, animal suffering, animal welfare, laboratory animals, vivisection | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 7, 2015 by David
A couple of days ago, a member of Compassion Over Killing, revealed footage that he recorded during the time he worked undercover at a Quality Pork Processors Inc. plant in Minnesota. The video depicted graphic and disturbing images of how pigs are treated during the slaughter process. While the video is not for the fainted hearted, it does shed light on a very real issue in factory farming, and serves as a way to educate the public about what really goes on behind closed doors.
The current Federal Meat Inspection Act regulates a broad range of activities at slaughterhouses to ensure both the safety of meat and the Continue reading
Filed under: animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal law, Uncategorized | Tagged: animal ethics, animal law, animal welfare, factory farms, industrial farming | 7 Comments »
Posted on December 2, 2015 by David
In a few months I will be celebrating my birthday and as has become the custom, this means an international trip inclusive of life changing experiences. Last year I went bungee jumping in Costa Rica, the year before that skydiving in South Africa, and the year before that hang-gliding in Brazil. This year I decided to check elephant riding in Thailand off my list however, recent discussions in my Animal Law class prompted me to reconsider my decision.
Although elephant riding appears seemingly harmless, many of these animals are tortured into submission through a process known as phajaan. Phajaan, which also means to crush, involves ripping baby elephants from their mothers and confining them in a very small space where they are unable to move. The baby elephants are then beaten into submission with clubs pierced with sharp bull-hooks.
As a result, an animal welfare bill was introduced in Thailand in 2014 to Continue reading
Filed under: animal cruelty, animal ethics, animal welfare, Uncategorized | Tagged: animal abuse, animal ethics, animal suffering, animal welfare, elephant riding, elephants | 1 Comment »
Posted on October 28, 2015 by David
This call for papers comes from my new homies at the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics:
The Ethics of Eating Animals
24-27 July 2016 at St Stephen’s House, Oxford
The Summer School is being organised by the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics in partnership with the French animal society, One Voice.
Papers are invited in English and French from academics world-wide on any aspect relating to the ethics of eating animals, including philosophical and religious ethics, historical, legal, psychological, scientific, and sociological perspectives. Potential topics include the morality of killing, the suffering of animals in food production, the portrayal of animals as meat, meat eating and climate change, the environmental impact of industrial farming, the utilisation of meat substitutes, in vitro meat and strategies for change.
Filed under: animal ethics, animal scholarship | Tagged: animal ethics, animal scholarship, diet, Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics | 2 Comments »
Posted on October 23, 2015 by David
From the email:
Call for Book Chapter Contributions
The Ethics of Animal experimentation: Working towards a paradigm change
Editors: Kathrin Herrmann and Kimberley Jayne
Even though nonhuman animals are used for a variety of different purposes, their use in research particularly has remained an ethical challenge. It is evident that nonhuman animals in laboratories are exposed to a great deal of physical and psychological suffering, and that the use of animals in research is growing internationally.
Arguably, legal reforms around the world have insufficiently improved the protection of nonhuman animals. However, Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes in the European Union is radical compared to other legislation. The Directive promotes a change of paradigm in nonhuman animal experimentation in establishing a goal of the full replacement of the use of live animals in research and education as soon as it is scientifically feasible (Recital 10).
Building on the radical vision of Directive 2010/63/EU, this book aims to illustrate the current situation for nonhuman animals used in science and aims to give a future outlook to the end of their use in research. Besides exploring the current ethical challenges and scientific controversies related to animal experimentation, this Volume aims to discuss ways to work towards a fundamental change of paradigm. We invite contributions from interdisciplinary scholars who share a vision for how this abolition of animal research can be achieved. The goal is to find solutions for this urging problem that are led by a culture of compassion for all animals.
List of recommended topics (but not limited to):
The legal framework: history, present and future prospects for an end of nonhuman animal use in science
The culture of language around the use of animals in research
The efficacy of the ‘Culture of Care’ incl. Refinement
Methods for assessing the quality of animal research (e.g. ARRIVE guidelines)
The politics of nonhuman animal experimentation
Transparency that benefits animals versus transparency that appeases the public and inhibits potential scrutiny and outrage (e.g. UK Concordat)
The capabilities and boundaries of public engagement
The psychological and social implications for animal research staff
The consequences of education and training using animals
The 3Rs – what is in it for the nonhuman animals Continue reading
Filed under: animal ethics | Tagged: animal ethics, animal experimentation, animal scholarship, Institute for Critical Animal Studies, vivisection | 1 Comment »